This week's online discussion topic revolves around a dyslipidemia case study presented in our Clinical Nutrition course notes.
Scenario: A general overview states that Mrs. X is a 47 year old depressed, obese, hyperlipidemic, hypertensive, menopausal female who feels she is at a point in her life where she can put some energy toward becoming healthier. She wants to know if there is anything outside the conventional allopathic approach (i.e. drugs) that would be helpful for her (note: considerably more health information regarding Mrs. X is revealed in the course notes than what I can share with you here).
Marty's Contribution: Mrs. X's story is an all too familiar one. In the final assessment of Mrs. X's condition, we learn that after 47 years of bodily abuse and fighting a losing battle with her dietary addictions, she is finally considering turning an eye towards her health. 47 years. Without drawing too many larger conclusions about societal priorities, I thought that Rusty (a classmate) brought up a great point in class about getting good, truthful health information into the school systems so that students can have positive lifestyle options as early as possible. Then, perhaps, folks like Mrs. X would not be faced with the dire health situation she currently finds herself in (and based on her history and current issues, she truly is in a dire situation).
Reading Mrs. X's history provoked feelings of sadness and sympathy. Slowly, her life began to degenerate, and along with it, her health. The truth is, the seeds of degeneration had been planted long before Mrs. X's life began to spiral out of control - the various stressful events in her life were simply the proverbial straw which broke the camel's back.
I agree whole-heartedly with Jess (another classmate) that Mrs. X has classic thyroid symptoms. The pounding heart, the obesity, the depression, the bouts of anxiety, the constant fatigue, the hypercholesterolemia, etc. all suggest thyroid involvement. And if there is thyroid involvement, you can bet there is also adrenal involvement, as the two operate on a teeter-totter system. Mrs. X's adrenals are probably fried from the chronic stress she has had to weather over the past decade or so. I expect she has entered the "exhaustion" phase of Selye's classic General Adaptation Syndrome.
The hypercholesteremia and the hypertension are not so much of a concern to me. These things are transient and can be altered in a relatively short span of time (without meds), provided there is good patient compliance. In fact, we expect to see an increase in BP with age - again, this is normal (BP should go up with age).
There are many natural supplements and dietary choices Mrs. X could make to reduce her cholesterol burden. But let's keep in mind the fact that cholesterol alone is not necessarily a "bad" thing. In fact, we need adequate amounts of cholesterol to support membrane-building cellular activity, intrinsic steroid production, etc. It's not the cholesterol Mrs. X is consuming which is the problem - it's the sugar. The sugar consumption forces the body to synthesize it's own cholesterol, which is then added to the cholesterol contributions from the diet which, in turn, sends blood lipid levels through the roof. Cut out the sugar and the body no longer feels the need to produce it's own cholesterol, provided an adequate amount is received through the diet. Before any other changes in health or lifestyle selection can occur, we have to stabilize Mrs. X's blood sugar. Taking the sugar out of the diet would most likely allow the depression to lift as well.
At one point in time, we harbored a similar cavalier attitude toward the effects of tobacco as we do today regarding sugar consumption. I have always felt that a large tax placed on sugary products (which turns out to be almost every processed food product) could help cut down on sugar consumption in general. Money is what people seem to understand and respond to best (as evidenced by the current increase in gas at the pumps). However, I can't imagine the sugar lobby would be too thrilled with this decision.
Mr. X is truly the "X" factor in this equation. Despite his good intentions, he's going to have to be willing to support his wife in her attempts to create a new, healthy lifestyle. The report mentions that the two share a very loving relationship, so the opportunity to work together to mutually raise the quality of their health is a hopeful possibility. Even though Mrs. X has abused herself for such a long period of time, the fact that she is looking to turn things around is very positive. You just hope you catch patients in a head-space where this sort of change is possible, and even if such a change isn't immediately possible, there is nothing wrong with planting a seed in their mind so that the next time they hear the information, it may be the right moment for a monumental lifestyle change.

