In an open letter to Dr. Malek, I describe the potential role of CAM in the public health strategy of developing nations:
Dear Dr. Malek,Thank you very much for your reply! You bring up a number of excellent points regarding the difficulties in broadcasting a program devoted to CAM's role in the public health system. Indeed, given the breadth of CAM modalities, it would be an unwieldy topic to tackle, and you are correct about there being marked differences in philosophical/theoretical underpinnings of each tradition (although strangely enough, most of these traditions are not incongruous with one another - there are, in fact, a number of common themes celebrated by all CAM modalities).
My idea, however, was not to single out any particular CAM modality to be trumpeted as a boon to public health initiatives, but rather to demonstrate that CAM providers collectively could play a significant role in the public health strategy of developing nations. There are 4 principle reasons why I believe CAM should be promoted alongside more traditional Western methods of treatment for those living in Third World poverty:
1) Low Cost Treatment - I recall you mentioning in program #61 (Medical Personnel Shortages in the Global South) that many MD's shy away from work in developing countries because they do not have access to the tests, medicines, or other tools they have become accustomed to using here at home. Although many CAM providers take full advantage of blood panels, urinalysis, and x-ray/MRI, etc., they do not necessarily share the other technological limitations (or in the case of drugs - cost limitations) of practitioners in the allopathic tradition. The very essence of CAM delivery promotes the use of manual medicine alongside a solid grounding in the scientific and philosophical basis of human health and disease; that is, physically working with nothing more than one's hands and knowledge to deliver care to those in need. It is no secret that conservative care is a vastly less expensive means of rendering treatment to the general public (and in this instance, to Third World populations). In this spirit, CAM represents a sustainable approach to long-term service to such vulnerable populations.
2) Preventive Public Health - CAM practitioners have long been champions of preventive public health measures; that is, the field is punctuated by a desire to address the underlying cause of disease while focusing efforts on eliminating the true source of the problem. Western medicine plays a VERY important role in taking care of those who are further along down the path of illness, but many of these illnesses could be avoided entirely given the general up-regulation of individual health in developing nations.
3) Manual Societies - As a student of chiropractic, I view the world through the eyes of a manual medicine practitioner. When I think about the importance of manual medicine on a global scale, I am immediately transported back to the Third World where the arduous strain of life's activities on the body is obvious and the implications of treatment profound. When a worker in North America misses a day of work due to low back pain or a headache, they might be forced to use one of their sick days. When a worker in, say, India, misses a day of work due to low back pain or a headache, their family doesn't eat. Providing a low cost, effective treatment to help alleviate this worker's pain would be tantamount to a life-saving experience. The demand for conservative care in this setting is present, but thus far the supply has been found wanting.
4) Culturally Appropriate Health Care - CAM providers such as Homeopaths, Naturopathic Doctors, or practitioners of Chinese Medicine already have a grounding in the medical traditions of Third World communities. For example, the traditional Tibetan medical practice of "Amchi" or the Ayurvedic tradition which is still so prevalent in India and other parts of Asia are not unfamiliar topics to many CAM professionals. A sound knowledge of traditional healing methods along with the desire to deliver culturally appropriate treatment (while still applying the very best of Western health care knowledge) leaves CAM providers in a great position to lend their efforts and expertise to the field of Third World public health.
I also agree with you on the topic of a poor general grounding in evidence-based approaches in both the allopathic and CAM professions, although I don't feel that this a particularly large stumbling block in providing effective treatment for those in need. Although more research is beginning to mount in the support of CAM strategies, CAM professions struggle mightily for a very small slice of the overall research budget allocated to the health professions. The volume of research produced is directly proportional to the level of funding received. In addition to this, the CAM professions do not enjoy the extraordinary funding from pharmaceutical companies that our allopathic cousins enjoy.
In terms of discussing an evidence-based approach to health care, I support the approach of Dr. David Suzuki, eminent Canadian researcher and environmental activist, who points out the inadequacies of a reductionist approach to understanding both the human organism and the world we occupy. If we truly consider human beings to be "wholograms," that is, more than just the sum of their component parts, trying to study and understand the body on a reductionist basis will be an inaccurate reflection of the true function of the organism. The process of reductionism is what science and research have largely been engaged in for the past 100 years. Without making a judgment call on the merits of this approach, I will simply say that randomized control trials, while the gold standard of our modern health care research approach, have serious flaws and limitations as well.
I apologize for the lengthy email Dr. Malek. I just wanted to provide some insight into possible CAM topics which could be addressed on Public Health Radio. Sadly, in terms of possible guests for the program, I do not have any names to offer you. Unlike the fine allopathic tradition of non-profit organizations dedicated to alleviating the suffering of the world's economically disadvantaged (e.g. Doctors Without Borders, Physicians for Human Rights, etc.), CAM has not fully realized it's potential in the realm of Third World public health (which in my mind, is all the more reason to stir up some excitement within the healthcare community!).
There are no doubt many dedicated individuals out there in the field of alternative healthcare who are currently battling the injustices of structural violence - they simply don't belong to any umbrella organization which would make their presence strongly known. I will put some more thought and effort into tracking down some sources if you think such a program would have merit. In fact, I do know of one such individual who is currently serving in an administrative role at my chiropractic college: Dr. Lester Lamm served as a chiropractor in Nepal for a number of years prior to returning to America to practice. He is a flamboyant individual, an animated storyteller, and a gifted speaker. He would actually be a perfect fit for the program now that I think about it. If you are interested, I could bring the idea to his attention. He would be in a better position than I to know of others in conservative care with a vested interest in this topic who could also contribute.
Thanks again for your time Dr. Malek,
Sincerely,
Martin Hughes

